Skip to main content
Question

Looking for 10 testers: OuViTel Cloud Print ↔ Zapier integration (webhooks + status updates)

  • January 28, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 19 views

Hi everyone,
I’m looking for 10 testers to help validate a new Zapier integration flow for OuViTel Cloud Print.

What is OuViTel Cloud Print?
OuViTel is a secure, cloud-native printing platform that lets businesses print from anywhere without local servers, VPNs, or complex IT setup. You can trigger print jobs from tools like Google Forms/Sheets, CRMs, POS systems, or any app that can send events, then OuViTel routes the job to the right printer and returns a print status / confirmation back to your workflow.

What we’re testing
We want to test real world Zapier scenarios such as:

  • - Triggering a print job from a form/record update
  • - Receiving status callbacks (completed/failed)
  • - Updating a Google Sheet/CRM record with job_uuid + status + timestamp
  • - Avoiding loops and ensuring reliable “update row” behavior

Why we need testers
Different accounts and setups (Sheets structure, triggers, filters, permissions) behave differently in practice. We want to make sure the recommended Zap structure is stable, loop-safe, and easy before publishing a standard template.

Who is this for?
Anyone who uses Google Sheets/Forms, Airtable, CRM tools, or webhooks and wants reliable cloud printing workflows.

If you’re interested, reply here and tell me:

  • - which app you’d trigger from (Sheets, Airtable, etc.)
  • - whether you want to test “create job” + “status callback” flows

I’ll share the test steps and sample payloads.

Thank you.

2 replies

drtanvisachar
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Zapier Solution Partner
  • January 29, 2026

For anyone testing, a few tips that may help:
Using a status column or Storage by Zapier can help prevent loops when the callback updates the same record that triggered the Zap. Filters or Paths are also useful to only run on net-new changes. For callbacks, Webhooks by Zapier Catch Hook is usually the cleanest way to receive job status and then update the original row or record.

Sounds smart to test this across different triggers and app setups before publishing a template. Hope you get some solid testers from the community.

Dr. Tanvi Sachar
Monday Certified Partner, Tuesday Wizard


  • Author
  • New
  • January 29, 2026

Thanks Dr. Tanvi, I totally agree.
We’re using exactly that pattern: Trigger Zap (create job) → Callback Zap (Catch Hook) → update the original record, with loop prevention via a status flag + conditional logic.

A couple extra details that helped us keep it stable:

Use a true unique key: we rely on job_uuid (and optionally an idempotency_key) rather than timestamps, since timestamps can collide or change formatting across apps.

Update by Row ID / Record ID when possible: after the initial “create job” step, store the sheet Row ID (or Airtable Record ID) so the callback Zap can update deterministically without re-lookup quirks.

Loop guard: callback Zap only updates when status transitions (e.g., blank → completed/failed). If already completed, it exits early.

If anyone here wants to try it, I can share:

- a minimal sample payload (job_uuid, status, occurred_at, requester fields), and

- a recommended 2-Zap structure (Sheets + Webhooks) that’s loop-safe.

Thanks again for the solid pointers.