Skip to main content
Question

Using filters in Zapier to connect Mighty Networks and Keap efficiently

  • February 17, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 10 views

I’m trying to connect Mighty Networks and Keap. Some of our products have several plans that can be used to access the individual product. In the past, I’ve set up Zaps for each plan, but that’s getting inefficient! There’s so much to keep up with as we refine and update and there are soooo many Zaps! Even with good naming conventions, it’s becoming difficult to keep up with everything.

What I’d like to do is use one Zap with a filter to step through all the possible plans for a particular product using OR and then update the Keap contact if any of the conditions are met. Does this sound doable? I’m still learning my way around Zapier, so a lot of my thoughts are hit-or-miss.

Thanks for any insight!

4 replies

Troy Tessalone
Zapier Orchestrator & Solution Partner
Forum|alt.badge.img+14
  • Zapier Orchestrator & Solution Partner
  • February 17, 2026

Hi ​@COA 

You may want to look into making the Zaps more dynamic by using lookup tables:

  • Zapier Tables
  • Airtable
  • GSheets

 

Core Concept: Replace Many Zaps with 1 Mapping Table

Instead of creating 1 Zap per plan, or building a single Zap with a large Filter step full of OR conditions, use 1 Zap that references a centralized lookup table.

The lookup table acts as a mapping layer between Mighty Networks plans and the actions you want to take in Keap.

Each row in the table represents 1 plan and defines what should happen when that plan is purchased.

 

For example, the table can map:

Plan ID or Plan Name → Keap Tag, Product Name, Access Level, or any other metadata you need.

 

Your Zap then works like this:

  1. Trigger fires from Mighty Networks when a purchase or subscription event occurs.

  2. The Zap captures the plan ID (or other stable identifier).

  3. The Zap searches the lookup table for a matching row.

  4. If a match is found, the Zap uses the values from that row to update the Keap contact.

  5. If no match is found, the Zap safely stops.

 

This approach eliminates the need for multiple Zaps and avoids large, hard-to-maintain Filter steps.

When plans change, you simply update the lookup table.

You do not edit the Zap.

 

The result is one scalable, maintainable Zap with centralized control over all plan logic.


  • Author
  • Beginner
  • February 18, 2026

Hi Troy,

That sounds like the perfect solution, unfortunately, I don’t know enough about tables (translation: almost nothing!) to implememnt it quickly and I’m working on a deadline. Do you think the filters will work for now, thenn I can upgrade our Zap usage as I do learn about tables?


Troy Tessalone
Zapier Orchestrator & Solution Partner
Forum|alt.badge.img+14
  • Zapier Orchestrator & Solution Partner
  • February 18, 2026

@COA 

We don’t have enough context to be able to evaluate and advise about the complete filter/path logic you are trying to implement.


SamB
Community Manager
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Community Manager
  • February 19, 2026

Hey there ​@COA 👋

If it helps we’ve got a guide on how to set up a lookup table in Zapier Tables here: Create lookup tables in Zaps

That said, if you’re wanting to only update the contact if they purchased a certain plan type then yes, in theory you could just use a filter. For the Filter I’d suggest using the (Text) Is in rule condition to check the plan that was purchased against a comma separated list of the applicable plans for that product. You can learn more about the different rules available for filters here: Filter and path rules in Zaps.

If you’d like to reduce the number of Zaps doing this sort of workflow, you could use Paths by Zapier instead of a filter to handle multiple products in a single Zap. Paths can use the same rule conditions that filters do, which would allow you to have one Zap handle the updating of the contact for multiple products. You can have up to 10 Paths in a Zap, so if you’ve got more than 10 products then you might need to have multiple Zaps still but the overall number of Zaps would be less as each could handle 10 products. If you’ve not worked with Paths before you can find out more about how to set them up here: Add branching logic to Zaps with paths.

Hope that helps. Keep us posted on how you get on with this!